Wilhelm Smitz, born into poverty in the German empire, was destined to be a rabble-rouser from a young age. Disliking authority, he found solace and purpose when he joined the assassins at the age of 15. With his unmatched skills and daring tactics, Wilhelm quickly rose to prominence, earning a legendary reputation by the time he turned 18 in 1914. During the chaos of World War I and the turbulent interwar period, Wilhelm's beliefs diverged from the traditional policies of the assassins. Rather than targeting only Templar loyal leaders and replacing them with assassin loyal ones, Wilhelm advocated for a more radical approach. He desired the assassination of all leaders regardless of their affiliations, driven by his anarcho-communist principles. His convictions for societal change often led Wilhelm to question and challenge the leadership of the assassins. His disobedience and rebellious nature put him at odds with the order, causing tensions within their ranks. Although his methods were unconventional and clashed with the traditional ethos of the assassins, Wilhelm believed that eliminating all leaders was the key to dismantling oppressive systems and establishing a more equitable society. Wilhelm Smitz's story embodies the conflict within the assassins themselves, as they grapple with the balance between their longstanding mission against the Templars and the desire for broader societal change. His anarchic-communist ideology introduced a new perspective to the brotherhood, challenging its core principles and forcing its members to confront their own beliefs. Whether Wilhelm's vision for a world without leaders is achievable or ethical remains a subject of great debate, even within the assassin brotherhood itself.

As World War I raged on, Wilhelm Smitz made a significant personal statement by changing the colors of his assassin outfit from the traditional white and red to black and red. This alteration symbolized his growing defiance and departure from the established norms of the brotherhood. During this time, he also formed a romantic relationship with a fellow anarchist member named Talia, further solidifying his commitment to his beliefs. In the aftermath of the war, Wilhelm and Talia decided to leave the assassins in 1919, feeling that their vision for societal change could not be fully realized within the confines of the brotherhood's traditional methods. Together, they embarked on a independent campaign, utilizing their skills and ideologies to challenge oppressive systems and fight for a more equal society. Their efforts spanned multiple countries and extended well beyond the interwar period. However, tragedy would eventually befall Wilhelm, as he was killed by Soviet troops in Romania in 1956. This marked the end of Wilhelm's personal journey but not the end of his vision. Following his death, Talia, along with Wilhelm and Talia's son, dedicated themselves to rebuilding the assassin brotherhood. Inspired by Wilhelm's legacy and their shared anarchist beliefs, they sought to carry on his mission and bring about the change he had fought for. The reconstruction of the assassin brotherhood proved to be a challenging task, with its own internal struggles and external pressures from the changing political landscape. However, the motives and determination of Talia and her son remained strong, ensuring that Wilhelm's vision continued to guide them. The story of Wilhelm Smitz reflects the complex nature of the assassin brotherhood, with its members often forging their own paths and challenging long-held beliefs. It showcases a breakaway from tradition and the pursuit of broader ideals, as well as the resilience of the individuals involved in rebuilding the organization after Wilhelm's death.

Wilhelm Smitz possessed a strong-willed and rebellious personality from a young age. Raised in poverty, he developed a deep-seated resentment towards authority figures and a determination to effect societal change. These qualities made him a natural fit for the assassin brotherhood, where his skills and ideologies flourished. Wilhelm was driven by an unwavering belief in anarchy and communism, advocating for the elimination of leaders regardless of their affiliations. This set him apart from the established policies of the assassins, causing him to challenge and disobey their leadership. His disdain for traditional authority and his desire to dismantle oppressive systems marked him as a formidable and complex individual. As a protagonist for an Assassin's Creed game, Wilhelm Smitz would offer a unique perspective and present significant moral dilemmas for players. His anarcho-communist ideals and willingness to challenge the established order would create a rich and complex narrative, questioning the very foundations of the assassins' mission. Wilhelm's personal journey would take players through the tumultuous years of World War I, the interwar period, and beyond. His defiance, coupled with his enduring love for Talia and their joint campaign, would make for a compelling storyline that explores themes of love, revolution, and sacrifice. While Wilhelm's radical views and his deviation from the brotherhood's policies may make him a controversial protagonist, his complexity and ability to provoke thought would offer players a chance to navigate a morally ambiguous world. Ultimately, his vision for a society without leaders and his determination to bring about change could make for a captivating and thought-provoking Assassin's Creed game.

In the present day of the Assassin's Creed universe, the Smitz family is still entangled in the age-old conflict between the assassins and the Templars. However, the dynamics within the family have evolved, causing a split among the modern-day Smitz siblings. The female sibling of the Smitz family has aligned herself with the Templars. Perhaps she was drawn to the Templar belief in order and control, seeing it as a means to create stability and prevent chaos. Her motives may be driven by a desire to maintain the status quo and preserve the existing power structures. Conversely, the male sibling, while no longer an active member of the assassin brotherhood, remains an ally to the assassins. His beliefs represent a delicate balance between the fundamental principles of the assassins and the Templars. Acknowledging the need for both freedom and order, he seeks a middle ground, understanding that extreme ideologies can lead to undesirable consequences. This division within the Smitz family reflects the complexity of the modern-day conflict. It showcases that not all individuals within these opposing factions adhere strictly to one side, as personal growth and exposure to different perspectives can lead to a more nuanced understanding of the world. The divergent paths taken by the Smitz siblings create a compelling tension and moral dilemma within the family. Their conflicting ideologies and loyalties would drive the narrative forward, as they navigate the intricacies of their relationships and the choices they must make while grappling with their shared legacy. This premise offers an opportunity for players to explore the fluid nature of allegiance and ideology within the Assassin's Creed universe, posing questions about the shades of gray that exist within the broader conflict. It would provide a rich and layered narrative, showcasing the complexities of the modern-day struggle between freedom and control.

In a tragic turn of events, both siblings of the Smitz family meet a gripping end in the modern-day Assassin's Creed setting. The male sibling, torn between the ideologies of the assassins and Templars, falls victim to his sister's hand. Perhaps their conflicting ideals and the mounting tension between them lead to a fatal confrontation, resulting in his demise. On the other side, the sister, aligned with the Templars, becomes a target of the modern-day protagonist. Bound by their own set of beliefs and motivations, the protagonist is forced to make a difficult decision, reluctantly choosing to end the sister's life. This dramatic conclusion emphasizes the ruthless nature of the Assassin-Templar conflict, where no character is exempt from its consequences. It also serves as a pivotal moment of change and resolution, abruptly ending the sibling rivalry and the complex bond shared by the Smitz family. With both siblings gone, their deaths symbolize the transformation of the Smitz family's legacy and the finality of their personal journeys. The aftermath of their demise would undoubtedly have a profound impact on the remaining characters and the overarching narrative, forcing them to confront the consequences of their actions and to reflect upon the cost of their participation in the ages-old struggle. Such a storyline would provide players with a poignant exploration of the human toll and emotional sacrifices endured in the Assassin's Creed universe, shedding light on the intricacies of loyalty, betrayal, and ultimate sacrifice in the modern-day setting.