summarize this "Affects the Idea of Monogamy and Marriage For a lot of middle-class and upper class folk, here is the proverbial 'script' that many men and women look to adhere to: 1) Graduate from high school by no later than the age of 18; 2) Graduate from college by no later than the age of 24; 3) Get engaged or married by no later than the age of 29 (35 years of age at the absolute latest); 4) The man is the designated 'leader' and 'breadwinner' of the household, and he finds a job that earns him enough money to provide food, clothing, shelter, and transportation for his wife and children; The woman is the primary 'nurturer' and nanny of the household, and after giving birth to one or more children, she makes sure the house is kept clean and organized, her husband and children receive hot, nutritious meals, and that the children have access to the highest quality of pre-school, grade school, middle school, and high school education and she makes sure that the children take care of their designated chores and homework assignments; 5) Once their own children graduate from college or graduate school and get married, then their household is considered an 'empty nest' and the married couple grow old together (while enjoying the company of any grandchildren that are born) until they both pass away one day. This script was, for the most part, adhered to by many men and women beginning with the 18th Century (if not prior) all the way up until roughly the first 60 years of the 20th Century. There are at least a handful of couples who I know personally that followed chronological points #1, #2, #3, and #4 fully throughout their lives and marriages. Even for those married couples that chose to bypass college and university life, and chose instead to enter into the workforce immediately after high school, many of these couples still generally adhered to this 'life events script.' LET'S VISIT A HYPOTHETICAL ISLAND FOR A MOMENT What if each and every woman in society firmly believed in only indulging in strictly monogamous sexual relationships with men? Would that benefit romantic relationships in society? Or would that hurt romantic relationships in society? What if each and every woman in society believed it was okay and acceptable to engage in promiscuous and/or polyamorous sexual relationships with men? Would that benefit romantic relationships in society? Or would that hurt romantic relationships in society?"

summarize this "Imagine a scenario where a new social environment was being formed with one thousand single women who varied in age between as young as eighteen and no older than thirty-five; also, you had a random selection of one thousand single heterosexual men who varied in age between as young as eighteen and no older than thirty-nine. Now, imagine each group met up on an island (nicknamed "Monogamy Island"), and after a 'meet and greet' function, each member of both genders were given the rules of the island: Rule #1: You cannot engage in oral sex, anal sex, and vaginal intercourse with any member of the opposite sex for the very first time until you have been officially declared as 'coupled up' with a chosen member of the opposite sex; Every action by each man and woman on the island will be monitored by multiple security cameras as well as with GPS-oriented microchip tracking devices implanted underneath the skin of each and every man and woman on the island; Rule #2: Once you have been categorized as 'coupled up' with a chosen member of the opposite sex, you can only engage in sexual activities with that chosen companion, and no one else, for a minimum of one-hundred-and-eighty (180) days; If you violate this rule prior to your 180-day deadline, your status will return to 'single and unattached again,' and you will only be allowed to have sex with a member of the opposite sex who has also violated the 180-day minimum for sexual monogamy; Rule #3: Every member of the opposite sex on the island will know when they interact with you exactly how many times you have violated Rule #2 and had your status changed from 'coupled up' to 'single and unattached again'; Rule #4: Any man who impregnates a female companion must remain faithfully monogamous to that same companion until the day he passes away; If a man is caught even attempting to have sex with a woman who is not the mother of his children, he will be placed into the island prison, and never be allowed to engage in sexual relations with anyone for the remainder of his life; Similarly, any woman who is caught even attempting to have sex with a man who is not the biological father of her children will be placed into the island prison, and never be allowed to engage in sexual relations with anyone for the remainder of her life; Rule #5: Abortions are not allowed; Also, any incidents of rape, date-rape, or sexual assault are punishable by death Rule #6: No money is ever allowed to be exchanged on this island; All food, clothing, entertainment, shelter, and transportation is provided for each of the select members of this island; Rule #7: The longest you can remain on the island without ever have been chosen to be someone's couple partner is twenty years. If no one has chosen you to be their exclusive romantic companion after a twenty-year period, you will be booted off of the island. Now, you have read all seven rules. If you fell into the appropriate age groups for each gender, would you be motivated to take up residence on this island? Especially if you were guaranteed to never experience any financial struggles or incidents of crime, violence, or poverty? Let's first examine Rule #1. If this rule was rigidly enforced, what problems do you see arising from this rule? The first question you would probably end up asking in relation to Rule #1 would be, "Is there a maximum length for the 'coupled up' period if the female partner does not give birth to any children? Nine months? One Year? Two Years? Three Years? Five Years? Longer?" Let's say there is no maximum period if the couple has no children born while they are together. What if one of the couples who resided on Monogamy Island got along very well when they were not engaged in sexual activities, but sadly, the couple had very little if any sexual chemistry or compatibility? In contrast, what about if another couple that resided on the island has fantastic sexual chemistry and compatibility, but whenever they are not engaged in sexual activities, all they do is argue, argue, argue? Let's say 'Kevin' and 'Kimberly' are the couple who have exceptional nonsexual chemistry and compatibility, but less-than-average sexual chemistry and compatibility. Then let's say 'Tyrone' and 'Tanya' are the couple who have fantastic sexual chemistry and compatibility, but very disagreeable and highly argumentative non-sexual chemistry and compatibility. After his sexual monogamy minimum of 180 days with Tanya has expired, Monogamy Island resident Tyrone ends up crossing paths with Kimberly, and later, these two choose to 'couple up.' Tyrone and Kimberly enjoy fantastic and mind-blowing sex, but for Kimberly, her level of non-sexual chemistry and compatibility with Tyrone is not nearly as enjoyable as it was with Kevin. Consequently, every now and then, Kimberly finds herself missing the flattering and entertaining nature of Kevin's accommodating personality and his nonsexual companionship. Similarly, once Kimberly decided to break things off with Kevin and connect with Tyrone for the next six months, Kevin ends up socially interacting with Tyrone's former lover Tanya, and after a dozen or more 'get to know each other' dates, Kevin and Tanya choose to 'couple up.' Non-sexually, these two get along GREAT. Tanya gets along with Kevin ten times better than she did with Tyrone. These two have no arguments or disagreements with each other whatsoever. Unfortunately, Tanya finds herself reminiscing on the kinky and extremely enjoyable and satisfying sex she experienced with Tyrone quite frequently, despite the non-sexual differences and arguments the her and Tyrone experienced with each other. Marinate on that scenario for a few minutes. Next, let's examine Rule #2. Despite having excellent non-sexual chemistry and compatibility with Kevin, Tanya reaches a point of sexual frustration that she simply cannot tolerate any longer. She ends up aggressively throwing herself at Tyrone, and lets him know that she wants to have sex with him behind Kevin's back at least occasionally. Tyrone knows that given the high level of security monitoring with cameras all over the island, not to mention the GPS tracking devices that have been implanted underneath their skin (these are referred to as 'sexual interaction sensors'), he would never be able to get away with engaging in sex with Tanya behind Kimberly's back without being caught by the Monogamy Island security personnel. Tyrone has no desire to return to the status of 'single and unattached' and be relegated to being limited to only being able to have sex with other 'Sexual Monogamy Offenders.' Ultimately, Tyrone rebuffs Tanya's sexual advances, and chooses to remain monogamous with Kimberly until his 180-day minimum has expired. Now, Tanya is extremely agitated and sexually frustrated. She still thoroughly enjoys the company of Kevin non-sexually, but sexually, Tanya still yearns for the erotically dominant and uninhibited sexual companionship of Tyrone. Tanya knows if she communicates this to Kevin openly and honestly, there is a great chance that this will ruin her non-sexual chemistry and compatibility with Kevin, so Tanya decides to keep her insatiable lust for Tyrone only known to herself and Tyrone. Over a period of weeks, Kimberly finds herself constantly whining and complaining about Tyrone's uncompromising dominance outside of the bedroom and also his blatant lack of enthusiasm toward engaging in conversation with her and spending time with her when the two are not engaged in sexual activities, but she is willing to tolerate it for the time being because he is providing her with what she feels is the kinkiest and most satisfying sex that she has ever experienced in her life. As you can surmise, both Kimberly and Tanya have reached a point of frustration in their relationships with Tyrone and Kevin respectively. One woman has a sexual problem in her relationships, and the other woman has a non-sexual problem. Marinate on this for a few minutes. Let's take a quick look at Rule #3. Because of Tyrone's ability to exercise a high degree of sexual self-control and resist the sexual advances of his former companion Tanya, he can continue having sex with Kimberly for the next six months, and then after that, he can couple up with a brand new female sex companion who might possibly be a virgin. This is what keeps Tyrone motivated and self-disciplined. Kevin is the one who is 'in the dark.' Kevin thought everything was great with Kimberly, but she chose to break things off with him and connect with Tyrone, leaving him confused and heartbroken. Right now, Kevin also believes everything is totally okay with Tanya, but unbeknownst to him, Tanya is greatly missing the sexual companionship of Tyrone. If Tanya was to be forthright with Kevin about the fact that she misses the sexual companionship of Tyrone, how do you think Kevin would feel after finding this out? His ego would be deeply bruised and for the second time in a row, he would experience a woman breaking his heart. Tanya realizes how hurt Kevin would become, so she chooses to indefinitely keep her undying lust for Tyrone to herself. Think about Kevin's situation for a minute or two. Now, let's move on to the trickiest rule of all: Rule #4. Guess what? Tanya is now unexpectedly pregnant with Kevin's baby. Kevin is ecstatic. Kevin had wanted a child with Kimberly, but she always seemed to be reluctant to raise a family with Kevin. Now, Kevin has the family he always wanted with Tanya, which means that - barring an unexpected miscarriage of some sort on behalf of Tanya - Kevin and Tanya have to remain 'coupled up' for LIFE according Monogamy Island rules. As to be expected, Tanya is full of very 'mixed' emotions. Tanya loves Kevin, but if she is being honest with herself, she loves Kevin more like a 'brother' and a 'purely platonic friend' much more than she sees Kevin as a man who she wants to spend the rest of her life with both sexually and non-sexually. If nothing else, for strictly sexual purposes, Tanya would very much prefer to be reunited with her former lover Tyrone. Unlike Kevin, Tyrone has made sure he has taken every precaution to prevent himself from impregnating Kimberly. Tyrone enjoys having sex with Kimberly, but he knows deep-down that he does not want to spend the remainder of his adult life with her. Tyrone wants to engage in as many 180-day short-term monogamous sexual relationships with as many women on the island as he possibly can. The Monogamy Island rules do not prevent Tyrone from becoming a 'serial monogamist.' If you are a woman reading this eBook right now, can you relate to Tanya's situation? What about Kimberly's situation? If you are a man reading this eBook right now, whose situation resonates with you more ... Tyrone's situation? Or Kevin's (unfortunate) situation? Think about that for at least a minute or two. Next, we examine the ultra-sensitive nature of Rule #5. What if Tanya did not want to give birth to Kevin's son or daughter? What if Tanya does not want to feel 'forced' to remain 'coupled up' with Kevin for the rest of her life? Tanya did not plan to get pregnant ... she was simply careless when it came to using birth control methods. Regardless, on "Monogamy Island," Tanya has no choice but to proceed with the pregnancy and give birth to Kevin's child (with the exception of if she was to experience a very unexpected miscarriage of the child that would be considered "beyond her control"; because of multiple security cameras, she cannot 'force' herself to experience a miscarriage). If you are a woman reading this paperback, think long and hard on Tanya's predicament. Have you, or a woman you know, ever found herself in a similar situation with a man? I even want my male readers to examine this situation long and hard too. Have you ever impregnated a woman unexpectedly, and you knew deep-down that you had no desire to spend the rest of your life with this woman, and you had no desire to even raise a family with this woman? Marinate on that. We now take a quick look at Rule #6. Do you think Tanya would be more motivated to remain with Kevin if he were able to provide her with a much better quality of life than Tyrone would be able to (e.g., a bigger living quarters, more expensive material possessions, higher quality of education for her children, etc.)? This is something to consider. In this scenario on Monogamy Island, Kevin is unable to offer Tanya any type of lifestyle and overall quality of life that is any more appealing to her than Tyrone would be able to offer her. On Monogamy Island, every man and every woman have access to the same overall quality of life, in terms of living quarters, quality of food, material possessions and transportation, and quality of education for the children. No one on the island is in possession of more wealth, more material possessions, and more social status than anyone else. Think about that. For the time being, we will skip examining Rule #7 because it does not validly apply to Tyrone and Kimberly's situation nor does it apply to Kevin and Tanya's situation. Now, let us return back to the real world. Imagine if the parallel to 'coupling up' on Monogamy Island in the real world society was society heavily promoting the idea of a strictly monogamous marriage between men and women. A strictly monogamous marriage could very well work out for a man and woman who thoroughly enjoy each other's company equally both sexually and non-sexually, and both have a strong desire to raise children together. For couples of this nature, the idea of a strictly monogamous marriage scenario does not present too many challenges or problems at all. This ideal situation between a man and a woman is what most people in society generally refer to as 'true romantic love.'"